Kerala’s Lok Ayukta Introduction: President Droupadi Murmu’s recent approval of the Kerala Government’s Lok Ayukta Amendment Bill signifies a significant shift in the state’s anti-corruption framework. This move comes after prolonged contention between the state government and Governor Arif Mohammed Khan, who had held back several bills, including the Lok Ayukta Amendment Bill, since 2022.
Lok Ayukta Amendment Bill Overview: The approved amendment curtails the Lok Ayukta’s powers to declare public servants ineligible if corruption or nepotism charges against them are proven. Additionally, it alters the competent authority for unfavorable decisions against the Chief Minister from the Governor to the Legislative Assembly. Similar changes apply to decisions involving MLAs, with the Speaker now designated as the competent authority. Furthermore, competent authorities gain discretion to accept or reject Lok Ayukta recommendations.
Background and Controversy: Governor Khan’s refusal to approve the Lok Ayukta Amendment Bill, along with other legislation, prompted the Kerala government to appeal to the Supreme Court. The delay in approval led to a legal standoff, with the Supreme Court emphasizing governors’ inability to obstruct the legislative process.
Implications of Presidential Approval: The President’s assent to the bill underscores the legality and necessity of the amendments made to the Kerala Lok Ayukta Act. It effectively shifts the appellate authority for Lok Ayukta decisions, affirming the legislative intent behind the reforms.
Political Response and Opposition: The Kerala Law Minister, P Rajeev, interpreted the President’s approval as validation of the amendments and criticized the Governor’s stance. However, the opposition, led by the Congress-led UDF, condemned the passage of the bill, labeling it a “black day” in the state Assembly’s history. They expressed concerns over the potential disruption of the anti-corruption system in the state.
Governor vs. Kerala Government: Governor Khan’s withholding of approval for the Kerala’s Lok Ayukta Amendment Bill, among others, sparked a constitutional dispute between the state government and the Governor’s office. The subsequent legal battle highlighted the importance of preserving the legislative process and preventing undue obstruction by constitutional authorities.
Conclusion: The Presidential approval of the Kerala’s Lok Ayukta Amendment Bill marks a decisive moment in Kerala’s governance landscape, reaffirming the state government’s authority to enact legislative reforms. Despite political tensions and opposition outcry, the reforms signal a commitment to strengthening anti-corruption mechanisms and upholding transparency and accountability in public office. As Kerala moves forward with implementing the amended Lok Ayukta Act, it sets a precedent for proactive governance and legislative autonomy in combating corruption and promoting good governance.